Small SMSFs develop rapidly

 

The latest industry research has shown SMSFs with low balances grow to levels allowing them to become cost-efficient very quickly.

 

         

A significant number of SMSFs considered uncompetitive on a cost basis typically with balances below $200,000 have historically grown to exceed this efficiency threshold in a very short period of time, new industry research has shown.

A Rice Warner study commissioned by the SMSF Association and supported by SuperConcepts found this to be the case when analysing 6000 funds with holding assets of between $100,000 and $200,000 in value at the beginning of 2017.

Rice Warner found by the end of 2017 its sample size had grown to 8000 funds, however, over the 12 months around 2000 had already grown beyond an asset balance of $200,000.

At the conclusion of 2018, the analysis showed around 3000 funds had exceeded the $200,000 cost-competitive threshold, with around 400 in the cohort closed down.

Further, at the end of 2019, just over 3000 funds had balances greater than $200,000 and 1500 funds in the group had been wound up.

“What you see with this over the three years is there’s only a minority of the funds that stay in the range. The biggest single group are the ones that move above the range and there’s a smaller proportion, but still a material proportion, that are actually closed,” Rice Warner senior consultant Alun Stevens observed during an online presentation of the research today.

“If you look at the smaller ones [with balances of] $50,000 to $100,000, the number that close actually rises.

“So what we can see across these ranges quite clearly was the smaller funds were either there because they were in the early phase of their life and they grew quite rapidly … or they are funds that are at the end of their practical life and you see a lot of them get closed.”

As such, there are many SMSFs with small balances remaining in existence for a long time, Stevens noted.

The study into the sector showed SMSFs with asset balances of $200,000 or more are cost-competitive with public offer funds and can be the cheapest retirement saving vehicle when the fund asset pool is in excess of $500,000.

 

 

Darin Tyson-Chan
November 23, 2020
smsmagazine.com.au

 

More Articles

How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history

Check out the countries that have been born from some of the largest empires in...

Read full article

How to budget using the envelope method

Here's five simple steps to create a budget that doesn't involve tracking every expense . To...

Read full article

Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package

The peak SMSF body has called on the government to extend the member ‘nudge’ rules beyond industry and...

Read full article

Accountants united in support for changes

The three major accounting bodies have backed the changes to the Division 296 tax and have called for it to be...

Read full article

Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has warned Australians to beware of high-pressure...

Read full article

Investment and economic outlook, October 2025

Latest forecasts for investment returns and region-by-region economic outlook . Australia Modest...

Read full article

Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy

It is important to understand what is and what isn’t an in-house asset to ensure compliance in an SMSF, a...

Read full article

Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296

SMSFs that hold farms or small businesses should do a “stress test” on their funds in preparation for the...

Read full article

Heathmont Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 68 106 250 104) trading as Heathmont Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd (ABN 74 630 256 227), Australian Financial Services Licence Number (AFSL) 513763.

Julian McGoldrick is an Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd AFSL 513763.

Financial Services Guide - Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

^